THE SIXTH TRANSFORMATION

 

COMMUNITY BUILDING

 

 

"They devoted themselves to the apostle's instruction and the communal life, to the breaking of bread and the prayers...those who believed shared all things in common...they went to the temple area together every day, while in their homes they broke bread.  With exultant and sincere hearts they took their meals in common, praising God and winning the approval of all the people.  Day by day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved".

 

                                                            Acts 2:42-47

 

This verse follows closely after the description of Pentecost.  It is clear that the author of Luke/Acts intended to connect the giving of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost with the idea of the "commissioning" of the church.  At Pentecost, the mantle of Jesus' earthly ministry of proclaiming the Reign of God is passed on to the church.  The question that must have faced them was, "how do we best structure the community to carry out this mission?"

 

A close reading of the verse cited above from the Acts of the Apostles reveals that from its very origins, the Christian community had two primary foci.

 

"They went to the temple area together every day".  They continued to observe the Jewish rites that were connected with the temple worship.  To reinforce this idea is the fact that Paul's pattern was to establish new churches around the local synagogue.  This structure and form would closely parallel our present parish or congregational structure.

 

"While in their homes they broke bread".  At the same time that the community gathered for temple worship, smaller groupings of Christians would gather in individual homes to observe Jesus' command to remembrance in the breaking of bread.

 

As the Christian community galvanized and drew farther from its Jewish heritage, becoming a distinct religious tradition in its own rite, the temple and synagogue observances became less and less a part of the community's normal pattern.  Eventually the "Oikos Ecclesiolae" - the Small House Church - became the normal form and structure of the Christian community.  This remained the norm until the middle of the fourth century.

 

When the Emperor Constantine issued the "Edict of Milan" in 312 C.E. Christianity became an official religion of the Roman Empire.  The community moved out of isolation and into the mainstream of society.  The Roman basilica replaced the house as the gathering place for the community, and the parish supplanted the house church as the normal structure for the church.  From that time until the present, the parish church has remained the sole experience of church for almost all Christians.

 

How effective is the parish in meeting the demands of Jesus' mission in contemporary society?

 

An assessment was offered by Bishop Albert Ottenweller in an address to the National Conference of Catholic Bishops:

 

"I believe that the traditional parish structure is too institutional, too authoritarian, too impersonal.  I believe strongly that people today are hungry.  They are hungry for friendship, hungry for celebration, hungry for God.  People today are searching.  They are searching for a group with whom they can live together in faith, searching for something that calls them to worship, searching for ways they can enter more deeply into themselves.  And people today are filled with longing.  They are longing for a place they can call home, longing for people who are truly their brothers and sisters in Christ, longing for a spiritual family in which they can risk being themselves and where they will be willing to give their lives for one another."[i]

 

Arthur Baranowski, pastor of a parish in Southgate, Michigan observes, "(A) continuing trend is toward large parishes where staff people specialize in education, worship or outreach - and this specialization can easily become compartmentalization.  As a result, parishes can have many activities without having a specific, clear-cut and workable plan for brining people together to reinforce each other as...Christians struggling to live a gospel life-style".[ii]

 

In light of this trend toward "bigness" and specialization, Baranowski goes on to ask, "...does a (person) feel loved and cared for simply by belonging to the church?"  His answer is obviously not because, "...our parishes don't bring people together in a way that they can easily care about each other".[iii]

 

Even the Vatican believes that there needs to be, "a rethinking...of the traditional parish community system; a search for community patterns which will be more fraternal, more adapted to people's life situation; more basic ecclesial communities;  caring communities of lively faith, love (warmth, acceptance, understanding, reconciliation, fellowship), and hope; celebrating communities; praying communities; missionary communities:  outgoing and witnessing..."[iv]

 

From all quarters the church is being challenged to find what we need and what we don't need in order to adapt our structures to the realities of life in contemporary society and the challenge to live in the light of the Gospel.

 

"...we don't need a better program; we need a better church.  We need a church that is itself a more obvious experience of sharing faith and caring for each other.  How can we get this "better church"?  By restructuring...into smaller churches, into small basic faith communities.  Not prayer groups, not scripture study groups, not another program of any kind - but permanent...small faith communities".[v]

 

All over the world people are responding to this challenge by forming small groups within which to live their faith.

 

Started in Central and South America, this movement toward small communities has spread throughout the world, adapting itself to the particular needs of the culture in which it finds itself.  Today in Brazil alone there are over 80,000 such communities.  In the United States, this movement has gathered increasing momentum in the past twenty years.[vi]  Called variously, Small Christian Communities (SCC), Intentional Christian Communities, or Small Church, these intimate gatherings represent a return to the roots of the Christian community in the house church.  "Once again...the church is being reborn as small, grassroots communities.  Their rise is not only a dynamic response to impersonal times, but also a way of enacting the vision of Vatican Council II...The Council...presented the church as a people, a communion, a discipleship of equals who celebrate life and live the gospel together.  This is cause for celebration, but also for decision.  Those who do not find a way of sustaining their faith in the days ahead will be overwhelmed by secularism, materialism and individualism...Therefore we must conquer fear and hesitation and break out of stiffening habits learned over a lifetime."[vii]

 

While the experience of the early Christian community is not normative in all respects for contemporary experience, it does provide a broad dynamic within two distinct kinds of structures, each of which can fulfill its own role in attaining to the four traditional characteristics of the Christian community:

 

o          Koinonia

 

            A gathering of people in a partnership of faith in Jesus Christ who share care

            and concern for one another.

 

o          Diakonia

 

            The call to the service of others which results from discipleship in Christ.  We

            are called to serve wherever there is a need for service.

 

o          Kerygma

 

            The name for the Great Story whose proclamation gathers the community                          together and provides the paradigm for the life of the disciple.

 

o          Leitourgia

 

The community's public acts of worship


 

The house church is a community in which the members make an intentional covenant with one another.  In the strictest sense these communities can be called Intentional Covenant Communities because they are:

 

o          Intentional

 

            They are purposeful, created with intent.

 

            Many people are members of churches or religious traditions because they

were born into it.  They have never examined their affiliation or made a conscious choice about it.  The Society's communities are intentionally created and membership is deliberately chosen.

 

o          Covenant

                       

The idea of covenant has several aspects to it.  The members are bonded and committed to one another, to the Society, and to the Universal Church.  They share a relationship with one another.  "A commitment to intentional community is an acknowledgment of the fact that being-related is central to human existence".[viii]

 

Covenant also conveys the concept of "voluntary".  In reality the church is a voluntary society, membership cannot be compelled.  In the same way, membership in the Society is voluntary and freely chosen.  "At one level, a  commitment to intentional Christian community is a promise to stay engaged over time with a particular group of persons...commitment makes ourselves available to specific others in a privileged way".[ix]

 

o          Fellowship

 

It is fellowship because it is "a relatively small group of persons (ideally eight to 12) committed to ongoing conversation and shared action along four distinguishable but interrelated dimensions:

 

- They are consistently committed to a high degree of mutuality in the      relationships among them.  (Koinonia)..

 

- They pursue an informed critical awareness of and active engagement within the cultural, political and economic megasystems of their society.  (Diakonia).

 

- They cultivate and sustain a network of lively connections with other persons, communities and movements of similar purpose.  (Diakonia).

 

-       They attend faithfully to the Christian character of their community's life.[x]

      (Kerygma and Leitourgia).


 

These aspects correspond to the traditional characteristics of Christian community of koinonia, diakonia, kerygma and leitourgia.

 

"Therefore, to say that intentional Christian communities are characterized by mutuality, social engagement, networking and Christian remembrance is to say that these small groups are concretely involved together in the genuine praxis of koinonia, diakonia, kerygma and leitourgia".[xi]

 

The communities have a set of aspects - relational, spiritual, and social which make up a "community dynamic" suspended on the poles of intentionality and covenant.

 

RELATIONAL ASPECTS

 

1.         Trust

 

            An atmosphere must be created and maintained in which people can feel safe in 

            being both vulnerable with and challenging to one another.

 

2.         Caring

 

The operative characteristic in the caring aspect is compassion.

- Compassion is "to have passion with".

  o        Empathy

  o        Concern for

  o        Love

 

3.         Forgiveness

 

o          The ability to ask for and offer forgiveness.

o          A willingness to reconcile differences.

o          Requires a true sense of equality among members.

            - If I am "better" than you I do not need your forgiveness, although I may

            "grant"you mine.

            - If I am "less" than you, I have no right to ask your forgiveness.

            - If we can forgive one another, we can then become reconciling forces in

  the world, Beacons of Reconciliation.

 

4.         Self-Esteem

 

Perhaps the most important, it allows for the other three to exist.

 

o          Each of us must hold the other in high regard as a child of God.

 

           "Look at the love the Father has lavished on us by letting us be called

            children of  God!  Yet, that is what we are".  I John 3:1a.

 

o          It is the responsibility of each of us to:

            a.         Love ourselves and hold ourselves in high regard.

 

-                        "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that

                         whoever  believes in him will never die".  John 3:16.

 

-                          If God loves me that much, what right do I have not to love

                         myself?

            b.         Love one another, hold one another in high regard, and support and                         encourage the self-esteem of one another.

 

"Let us love in deed and in truth, and not merely talk about it.  This is our way of knowing we are committed to the truth".  I John 3:18-19.

 

PRAYER - A BRIDGE CHARACTERISTIC

 

None of the relational aspects can be achieved outside of an atmosphere of  prayer.  Prayer is the central avenue God uses to transform us.

 

The relationships which we seek to establish with one another are:

 

            Impossible without true prayer, and

            Inescapable with true prayer.

 

A life centered in prayer will transform all of our relationships.  Prayer is not so important because of what it causes God to do, but because of what it causes us to do!

 

PRAYER IS THE BRIDGE BETWEEN THE RELATIONAL  AND THE SPIRITUAL ASPECTS OF THE COMMUNITY DYNAMIC.

 

CELEBRATION - A BRIDGE CHARACTERISTIC

 

If prayer is a way of life, CELEBRATION is an attitude toward life.

 

"All this I tell you that my joy may be yours and your joy may be complete"  John 15:11.

 

"The fruit of the Spirit is joy"  Galatians 5:22.

 

Joy and celebration is what keeps life from becoming dull and uninspiring.  It is not accidental that wine is part of our important celebrations.



[i]Evelyn Eaton Whitehead, ed., The Parish in Community and Ministry, (New York, Paulist, 1978), pgs 12-13.

 

[ii]Arthur R. Barnanowski, Creating Small Faith Communities, Copyright 1988, Arthur R. Baranowski, pg. 2.

 

[iii]ibid, pg. 3.

 

[iv]Vatican Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity, Sects or New Religious Movements in the World: Pastoral Challenges, United States Catholic Conference, May 3, 1986, 13.

 

[v]Baranowski, Creating Small Faith Communities, pg. 6.

 

[vi]As of July 1991, forty dioceses in the United States, and one national office in Canada have a staff person responsible for the promotion of small Christian communities.

 

[vii]John J. Fitzpatrick, Bishop of Brownsville, Pastoral Letter of May 6, 1990

 

[viii]Bernard J. Lee and Michael A. Cowan, Dangerous Memories:  House Churches and Our American Story, (Copyright 1986, Bernard J. Lee and Michael A. Cowan), pg. 95.

 

[ix]ibid, pg. 94.

 

[x]ibid, pgs. 91-92.

 

[xi]ibid, pg. 93.